Beta site bug report and feature request:  
 
Donate now
Worldview Weekend Tube & Radio
The content within Worldview Weekend Tube & Radio is always FREE. To find out more about the full content library available with a subscription to the Situation Room, click here.

on Roku

Roku Channel

on iPhone

iPhone App

on Android

Android App

on the Web

you've arrived!
or login here.
« back

Crosstalk: June 1, 2016

Crosstalk Guest: Dr. David Brown. Topic: 2 Timothy 3:16 is the Bible verse that covers the inspiration of the Bible (God breathed out his words) while 2 Peter 1:21 covers the fact that God's Word is not man's ideas. The Holy Ghost carried the writers along to write out exactly what God had breathed out, in their own style. In other words, we have the words of God in our Bible today. Dr. Brown noted that while we don't have original manuscript evidence for the Bible, we have copies of those originals. In fact, there are thousands of examples of Greek manuscript evidence to support the accuracy of the Bible. He cited one in particular known as the Magdalene Fragment that dates back to about 70 AD. It agrees with the text of the King James Version of the Bible. The Bible was written over a period of about 1,500 years. It began with God's revelation to Moses on Mount Sinai. The Old Testament is testified to in the scroll of Isaiah. Regarding the Jews who preserved the Old Testament, they were so meticulous in their efforts, they couldn't write anything from memory. Dr. Brown described the process beginning with a reading scribe, a writing scribe and a checking scribe. By the end of the 1st century or the beginning of the 2nd century, the books of the New Testament were collected into one volume. Dr. Brown believes by that time the church recognized what was God's Word and what wasn't. Writings that fit the latter category include the Gnostic Gospels. Dr. Brown mentioned how the term 'canon' means 'reed or measuring rod' but came to mean 'a rule of faith'. In light of that, what should we make of the Apocrypha? Why isn't that part of the canon of the Bible? There are no Hebrew manuscripts of the Apocrypha. So while it was added in, in the 1400's the Westminster fathers indicated that although they felt it was good for historical purposes, it was not to be taken as Scripture. As part one moved along, Jim had Dr. Brown discuss the following: --Since we don't have the original manuscripts, which copies can we depend upon? --How did the Bible move from the Hebrew to the Latin Vulgate? --Why did the Roman church prevent people from reading the Bible on their own? --What men did God use to break this grip of church control? --Who was Richard Hunne?

Loading our player ...

If you are having difficulties loading our media player please consider updating your web browser. For your convenience links to the most popular web browsers are provided below.

Mozilla Firefox | Internet Explorer | Google Chrome

Download MP3 File

Download MP3
Right-click the link and choose "Save Link As..." to save the document to your computer